In its purest form, a newspaper consists of a collection of facts which, in controlled circumstances, can actively improve knowledge. Unfortunately, facts are expensive, so to save costs and drive up sales, unscrupulous dealers often "cut" the basic contents with cheaper material, such as wild opinion, bullshit, empty hysteria, reheated press releases, advertorial padding and photographs of Lady Gaga with her bum hanging out.
This is what I was getting at. I mean, the whole ad is just so...disturbing to me on so many levels, none of which have anything to do with it being anatomically correct.
This doll isn't being marketed for potty-training and I think the whole idea of buying a doll like this to play with is kind of stupid.But whatever floats your boat.
44cm is really quite large for a baby wee wee.
When my second son was born, I bought my first son a very real looking doll and it had a penis. I specifically looked for one that was anatomically correct because I wanted my son's "baby" to be as real looking as a doll can be. It was a great idea for us. When I fed Johnny, Mattie fed his baby. When I changed Johnny's diaper, Mattie changed his baby's diaper. When I rocked Johnny,Mattie rockd his baby. It was cool.![]()
In what ways is it wrong for a girl child to see a boy doll penis?
I don't see why 7 yr old wouldn't paly with it. At aorudn that age, i dressed my dolls, I chagned thier diapers, I pretened to feed them, I pretended to nurse and bottlefeed them. WHy woudln't I pretend to potty train them?
I got a Betsy Wetsy when I was about 7-8. Not anatomically correct. She didn't work well though. Wtaer jsut leked out aorund her arms & legs and neck too./ Same with the one I got Rachel. Why can't they design them better?
Mommy to The Angelkitten!