We have dolls at our school for the kids that are anatomically correct, and whenever kids talk about it, we use the correct names. To kids, it's not a big deal. Some parents get REALLY uncomfortable about it, but the kids, no.
I can't imagine paying for a doll that pees. I mean, really.
Oh, my friend's son got to watch his doll poop a tootsie roll too.Originally Posted by justthinking
Meh, doesn't bother me, but I do understand why it'd be shocking since the US doesn't really have anatomically correct dolls out there. The intact thing is normal to me, given that's all I have in this house. But seeing as how I'd probably do a double take to see a circ'd penis, I can understand the shock of that too. (Nothing wrong with a circ'd penis, it's just not what I see during diaper changes so it'd just be "different" to me, kwim?)
JamieWife to MatthewMommy to Ashleigh, Collin, Justin, Lucas and Nathan
I'm not... overly excited about a doll that has bodily functions (that's what imagination is for..).. but I don't have any problem with anatomically correct dolls at all.
So now you know how Penelopeen Rea felt in The Crying Game?
I had a the baby brother tender love doll that was anatomically correct and peed.
http://www.dollinfo.com/mbtendlv.htm My daughter has him now.
My friend had a baby Joey (baby from Archie Bunker show). He had a penis and peed too. http://www.wltc.org/dolls/JoeyStivic.htm
I don't remember it being a big deal to me and I still don't think there is anything wrong with it.
Why isn't there a special name for the tops of your feet? Lily Tomlin
There was one back in the '70's... I remember seeing it in the Penny's Catalog.
I had the girl version... Baby Tender Love, I think... you poked a bottle of water in her mouth she wet a diaper... weird thing was, she came with panties and not a diaper.
She had "Baby Brother" or something like that and he did have a penis... didn't look close enough to see if it was circ'd or intact...
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
It was a complete shock to me! 
